In Class: Sarah Haskins

In the video, her controling idea is that guys should try different tactics to get hott chicks than to get regular women. she uses comercials that support this claim, and goes further into detail how hott chicks like: smells, burgers, and cable. overall, it was a good example of an arguement, with support, and a fairly good idea.

In Class: Free Write - Topics

i wish i didnt sign up for early classes everyday but friday...fridays are awesome.

i wish there wasnt so many stupid people.

i wish that there was better options for the free food at market square, and that 1873 was cheaper.

i feel like we can get more benifits from a school that we pay so much to go to

i wish there wasnt so much control on underage drinking, even though it is illegal.

i wish fraternity stuff wasnt so last-minute.

i wish i got good parking everyday







i fight about roomate being whipped hardcore by a girl, who has a boyfriend, that could possibley be just using him. shes making things confusing and pulling him away from his friends in and out of his fraternity

i fight about





Stupid People - its something everyone close to me knows about me, i could be considered just impatient, but thats just what my mom tells me. everyday i never seem to get surprised by the geniuses of the world driving like idiots, or acting like theyre just now hitting puberty. people that park terrible, and dont know how to read signs that are right in front of them. people who think they are above all, yet cant do anything right. having worked with the public for several years, a lot come to my mind about stupid people



People will probably think im too judgemental on the intelligence of the public, but some will also agree with me. i will do some research on this, because i think it could be a good, probably funny paper. the people who dont agree with me are the extremely nice people, which isnt bad. i hope that the paper doesnt seem harsh in any way, just expressing my point of view on the subject.

Rhetorical Response 4

Thunder from the right on gun ruling is an argument essay discussing the opinions on gun control laws in the united states from several conservative court justices. Antonin Scalia is the main creator of these discussions in the case, all explaining his point of view on the subject, which is not supporting heavy restrictions on the ownership of firearms.

i see this example as being a good representation of a argument essay, yet the material in it did seem to not flow good, and i know i got lost a few times and found myself re-reading sections. it does include the opinions of different sides by not trying to win the readers opinion, and supports each with fairly strong evidence